Outsourcing Services to a Third Party: Privacy Impacts and Service Organization Control Reports

Tweet along at #MHMwebinarOutsourcing services and functions to third party providers can create legal, compliance, due diligence and audit oversight challenges in an environment where privacy laws can vary by jurisdiction and be interpreted unpredictably. Even the most conscientious company can make a false step as it captures, uses, transfers and discloses personal information with third-party service providers.

Please join us on Thursday, May 2, for Mayer Hoffman McCann’s free Executive Education Series webinar providing an overview of the issues regarding outsourcing services to third parties. Presenters John Robichaud of MHM and Cynthia Larose of Mintz Levin will discuss Service Organization Control (SOC) reporting and privacy laws and regulations surrounding outsourcing.

MHM Executive Education Series:
Outsourcing Services to a Third Party:
Privacy Impacts and Service Organization Control Reports

Thursday
May 2, 2013
11 a.m.–1 p.m.
Eligible for 2 CPE
More information and online registration»

Do Your Audit Committee Communications Meet PCAOB Requirements? Find Out on April 25.

Tweet along at #MHMwebinarOn Thursday, April 25, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. is proud to present you the second installment of our 2013 Executive Education Series: Do Your Organization’s Audit Committee Communications Meet the PCAOB Requirements?

During this course, MHM Shareholders Rich Howard and Keith Peterka will walk you through the current events and activities being undertaken by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) including the latest requirements outlined in Auditing Standard No. 16 regarding communications with audit committees.

If you are a member of management, auditor of or involved in oversight and governance of an SEC reporting entity you are encouraged to attend this informative session that will provide tips for how to comply with the most recent developments.

MHM Executive Education Series:
Do Your Organization’s Audit Committee Communications
Meet the PCAOB Requirements?

Thursday
April 25, 2013
11 a.m.–12 p.m.
Eligible for 1 CPE
More information and online registration»

We have a full schedule of Executive Education Series webinars for 2013! You can check out all of our upcoming topics on the MHM website.

How will the Changes to the Reporting Requirements for Reclassifications from AOCI Affect You?

The FASB has amended the reporting requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The changes are described in Accounting Standards Update 2013-02, and they take effect on a staggered basis for public and private companies. The chart below helps summarize the changes for both types of companies.

AOCI Reporting Requirements ChartTables can be found as an appendix to the PDF version of MHM Messenger 8-13

For More Information

For more in-depth information about the reporting requirements for reclassifications, see the latest issue of the MHM Messenger.

For additional background on prior steps taken by the FASB to increase the prominence of comprehensive income and the effects on net income, see these other publications from Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.

Is Your Company Properly Disclosing Offset Assets and Liabilities? New Requirements Take Effect in 2013

Starting with 2013 financial statements, companies need to make additional disclosures about assets and liabilities that are offset on their balance sheets. These disclosures are expected to be helpful to users of financial statements, and they will be slightly less onerous than originally expected, thanks to a clarification issued by the FASB earlier this year as Accounting Standards Update 2013-01.

Our subject matter experts from Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. discuss the additional disclosure requirements and highlight the effects of the clarification in this MHM Messenger: Disclosure Requirements about Offsetting Take Effect in 2013.

Join Us on April 18: What Private Companies Need to Know about the AICPA’s Proposed Framework

Tweet along at #MHMwebinarJoin Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. on April 18 for the first webinar in our 2013 Executive Education Series.

During this course, MHM Shareholder Mike Loritz will discuss the potential application of the Financial Reporting Framework for Small and Medium-Sized Entities (FRF for SMEs) as well as some of the more significant differences between the AICPA framework and US GAAP and how it may impact your business.

MHM Executive Education Series:
What Private Companies Need to Know
about the AICPA’s Proposed Framework
Thursday
April 18, 2013
11 a.m.–1 p.m.
Eligible for 2 CPE
More information and online registration»

This free course will focus on:

  • Background and reasons for the AICPA project
  • Potential implementation of the framework
  • Some of the more significant differences between the framework and US GAAP

Need to know more about the proposed framework now? Then check out our recent publication detailing the controversy surrounding this project: MHM Messenger 6-13: AICPA’s Special-Purpose Framework Proves Controversial.

Learn about the Hottest Topics in Accounting by Attending MHM’s 2013 Executive Education Series Webinars

MHM Executive Education Series WebinarsMayer Hoffman McCann P.C. (MHM) is pleased to invite you to attend our 2013 MHM Executive Education Series™ webinar courses. This specialized online training is designed to educate and inform our clients and the public about complex accounting subject matters and current events. Courses typically run one to two hours and free Continuing Professional Education (CPE) credit will be provided.

Given the positive feedback and great attendance from last year’s series, for 2013 we have expanded our offering to include additional speakers and new topics, with a total of 29 sessions spread throughout the months of April through December.

The series kicks off on April 18 with an update for private companies regarding the AICPA’s proposed Financial Reporting Framework for Small and Medium-Sized Entities (FRF for SMEs).

Other topics for the series will include:

  • Quarterly accounting updates on new standards and exposure drafts from regulatory boards
  • Not-for-profit accounting matters
  • Privacy impacts and SOC reporting for companies who outsource
  • Accounting and finance issues of technology companies
  • Updates on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and where companies should focus
  • Understanding interest rate derivatives, commodity hedging and managing risks as interest rates climb
  • Accounting topics specific to the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry
  • Employee Benefit Plan (EBP) accounting and ESOP

Don’t miss this free opportunity to broaden your knowledge of accounting and financial matters! Sign up now to receive announcements of upcoming courses in your inbox.

For more information and to view the full schedule, please visit our Executive Education Series webpage or follow the conversation on Twitter by using the hashtag #MHMwebinar.

What are the Major Differences between the AICPA’s Proposed Framework and US GAAP?

The AICPA has proposed the use of a principles-based framework as a practical compromise between GAAP and the unmet needs of some financial statement users.

At Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. we’ve been following this topic closely. For your convenience, we’ve compiled the list below which highlights a number of areas in which the OCBOA framework would depart from or be less prescriptive than US GAAP.

  • Measurement basis: Historical cost is the primary measurement criteria. Only held-for-sale equity securities are measured at fair value.
  • Inventories: Inventories are measured at the lower of cost or market, with market defined as net realizable value. The cost of inventories is calculated using the first-in, first-out (FIFO), last-in, first-out (LIFO), or weighted average cost formula.
  • Property, plant and equipment: Permitted depreciation methods include a straight-line method, a variable charge method that reflects service as a function of usage, and other methods that may be appropriate in certain situations. The amount of depreciation that should be charged to income is the greater of (a) the cost, less salvage value over the life of the asset, or (b) the cost, less residual value over the useful life of the asset.
  • Goodwill: Goodwill is amortized. The period of amortization is generally the same period as that used for federal income tax purposes, or a period of ten years if the goodwill is not amortized for federal income tax purposes.
  • Revenue: For services and long-term contracts, performance is determined using either the percentage of completion method or the completed contract method, whichever relates the revenue to the work accomplished.
  • Leases: Lease accounting for financial reporting is aligned with lease accounting for federal income tax purposes. The criteria for capitalizing a lease are the same for book and tax purposes.
  • Accounting for income taxes: Companies would have the flexibility to make an accounting policy election to use either: (a) the taxes payable method, or (b) the deferred income taxes method. Under the taxes payable method, only current income tax assets and liabilities are recognized. If a portion of current income taxes is unpaid, it is recognized as a liability; if a portion is refundable, it is recognized as an asset. The liability for current income taxes on the balance sheet is the cost or benefit of current income taxes for current and prior periods less amounts already paid for these income taxes.
  • Subsidiaries and consolidation: The OCBOA framework would not use the concept of variable interest entities. Instead, the framework would spell out that consolidation is not appropriate when an entity has a limited right and ability to determine or influence the strategic policies of another entity but does not control it. A holding of an interest in an entity that is not a subsidiary would qualify as an investment. Companies would have the flexibility to make an accounting policy election to either: (a) consolidate their subsidiaries, or (b) account for their subsidiaries using the equity method.

More Information

Learn more about the proposed framework in our latest MHM Messenger: AICPA’s Special-Purpose Framework Proves Controversial»

Related Webinar

We will also be hosting a free webinar on April 18 regarding this topic. Register now to attend the first course in MHM’s Executive Education Series: What Private Companies Need to Know about the AICPA’s Proposed Framework.

%d bloggers like this: